
Elias contends that the modern condition implies a collapse of an eating community as a structuring principle of social life and also manifests a tendency to a marginalisation of the meal. He asks the question. If the consumption of food has been increasingly deregulated in this way, if shared meals have lost their importance and if food is consumed increasingly in the form of snacks, to what extent does this represent a reversal in the civilizing process?
However, less formal does not necessarily mean less civilized, but perhaps it is true that the less communal meals become the less influence they have as structuring principle. What has this to say to the church and its shared meal of communion?
No comments:
Post a Comment